12.28.2011

47. The Niigata Sake Book

The Niigata Sake Book, The Niigata Sake Brewers Association
89 pages, The Japan Times, 2008

Oh man, this was SO DISAPPOINTING. My region is supposed to have the best sake in Japan and I've always wanted to learn more about it, how it's made and the different varieties, so I thought this book would be really interesting. But the translation is total crap--the most irritating thing was the constant use of "gracious" as a way to describe sake flavor (dear translators, just because you are translating between two very different languages does not mean you can just make up new meanings for English words whenever you feel like it), but the whole thing was riddled with unclear statements and bizarre adjectives and "Unnecessary Capitalization and Quotation Marks." The writing style is also intolerably dry and technical, and the book is full of more puffed-up nonsense than actual information. I did manage to glean a little bit of knowledge about the brewing process and different sake classifications, but it wasn't anything that's not in the Wikipedia entry for sake, which is better written to boot. This does make me wonder about what's available in English--I think there's definitely a market for a well-written Sake 101 sort of thing.

46. Notes from Underground

Notes from Underground, Fyodor Dostoevsky
Bantam Books, 153 pages, 1864, translated by Mirra Ginsburg in 1974

I put off reading this forever and ever and ever because of Dostoevsky's reputation as a dense, difficult, cerebral novelist, but finally the book challenge forced me to give in because it was one of the few short books I had left to read and now I wonder what took me so long.

I swear to God I read somewhere that the Beat Generation was heavily influenced by Notes from Underground, and now I can't find any reference to it, which is too bad because reading it gave me a new way of approaching the main question I had about On the Road: if Jack Kerouac honestly believes in the Beat way of life (as he seems to), why does it come across as so repugnant? (Or, since he's apparently self-aware enough to realize how destructive it is, why does he believe so fervently in it?) At the time I read it I came to the conclusion that he was just painting a picture of the Beat Generation in the entirety of its glory and despair. In Notes from Underground, though, the underground man prioritizes freedom and self-expression over happiness and well-being, saying that "man, whoever he might be, has always and everywhere preferred to act according to his own wishes rather than according to the dictates of reason and advantage." He goes on to portray base, random, irrational acts as a sort of rebellion against 18th-century ideas of human nature as essentially good and rational, saying that "though [human nature] may be wrong, it's nevertheless alive." I think this is what On the Road is getting at--freedom at any cost; putting authenticity and ecstasy and experience above stability and order and well-being.

(This is not all I got out of Notes from Underground, by the way--it's just the only thing I can say that somebody else hasn't already said better.)

12.27.2011

45. Hogfather

Hogfather, Terry Pratchett
Corgi Books (UK), 445 pages, 1996

I read this on Susi's recommendation after I mentioned to her that I was disappointed with Small Gods, and she was right--it's much better. It wasn't laugh-out-loud funny or anything, but it was fun and inventive and (I think) a much better example than Small Gods of why people love Terry Pratchett so much.

44. The Time of Their Lives

The Time of Their Lives, Al Silverman
St. Martin's Press, 467 pages, 2008

This history of all the major American publishing houses in the years between World War II and the early 1980s was an impulse buy on Amazon, on a day in L.A. when I had gotten one too many rejection emails from public relations firms I didn't really want to work for anyway, and needed to let myself dream big. (That day I also bought Max Perkins: Editor of Genius, a biography of the legendary Scribner editor.) At the time I had just started to think about book publishing as a career, and didn't really think about the differences between the huge, mostly New York-based mega-publishers covered in the book and the small, independent, boutique San Francisco houses I'd probably be applying to.

The Time of Their Lives is heavily focused on the business of publishing--sales figures, advances, and description after breathless description of bidding wars into the millions for novels by the next Stephen King. (There were a few anecdotes about editors shaping manuscripts into the novels they would become, and even some about publicity tactics, but they were few and far between.) Although I doubt megamillion-dollar auctions figure much into the day-to-day operations at Heyday Books or Seal Press, the book did give me a feel for what publishing is about in a big-picture sense. As someone who can't even name the Big Six (there are six, right?) publishers, much less give an editorial overview, I did spend a lot of the time confused--most of the chapters (each focusing on one company) were non-chronological, jumping back and forth through time, and the author had a maddening tendency to refer to each person sometimes by their first name, sometimes by their last name, and sometimes by a nickname. This probably works if you're already familiar with all the major figures in the New York publishing world, but I constantly had to page back to see who we were talking about. Still, it's a solid (if not 100% applicable to my situation) and engagingly written overview of publishing in America in the 20th century.

43. A Moveable Feast

A Moveable Feast, Ernest Hemingway
Scribner, 188 pages, 1964

The guy who sold me on Tropic of Cancer--some acquaintance of my ex-boyfriend who we ran into in Moe's Books in Berkeley one day--said "It's a great book to read when you're depressed because Henry Miller is broke and cold and hungry and yet half the book is just him wandering around Paris thinking about what he's going to eat next," and I think that also sums up at least half of why I loved A Moveable Feast. The rest of it is Hemingway's approach to his work, his rules for writing--stop when the words are flowing and you know what's going to happen next; don't think about your work when you're not writing; read other books at night to keep your mind off your own work; write one true thing, write the truest thing you know. I love reading about writers' working habits (another example: Jack Kerouac's Belief & Technique for Modern Prose) and I especially love looking into artistic movements and communities of the past, where the cast of characters is peopled with huge names in art and literature, and everyone is constantly exchanging ideas and feeding off of the collective energy. (Not that being part of an artistic movement necessarily raises one above the level of a gossip column; the chapters about F. Scott Fitzgerald, self-absorbed and neurotic as he is, are brilliant.)

42. The Lake

The Lake, Banana Yoshimoto
Melville House, 188 pages, 2005, translated by Michael Emmerich in 2011

It's probably a function of language or translation or some combination of the two, but all the modern Japanese authors I've read--Haruki Murakami, Yoko Ogawa, Banana Yoshimoto, to some extent even Mishima--share certain qualities of style: extreme care and attention in describing discrete physical objects (a carton of milk in Murakami's Kafka on the Shore, grapefruit jelly in Ogawa's Pregnancy Diary, a wire grilling rack in The Lake), combined with a certain vagueness of feeling, told in a voice characterized by colloquialism and familiarity and a very Japanese measure of ambivalence (lots of "you know" and "well, I" and "that's just the way I feel"). I really love this style and it's probably part of why I can read any of the above authors writing about any damn old thing.


The Lake centers around the relationship between optimistic artist Chihiro and oddball grad student Nakajima. Chihiro is strong and independent, but in facing her mother's death comes to realize that she is still in a way trying to escape the small town she grew up in; she enters a tentative relationship with Nakajima, supporting him through his attempt to overcome childhood trauma. I wouldn't call it a brilliant plot--although Nakajima constantly alludes to a terrible secret that is revealed near the end of the book, nothing ever really happens--but Chihiro's inner world is so rich and detailed that there's always something to come back to, something more to explore and ponder. After this book I'm looking forward to reading more Banana Yoshimoto!

12.23.2011

Top 5 books I'm dying to read when the book challenge is over

1. The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs (a classic of city planning)
2. Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea by Barbara Demick (woooo impulse buy)
3. Imperial San Francisco: Urban Power, Earthly Ruin by Gray A. Brechin (about San Francisco's elite and the political and environmental havoc they wreaked on California)
4. War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy
5. Can't Stop Won't Stop: A History of the Hip-Hop Generation by Jeff Chang

Being on a nonfiction kick is slightly inconvenient when you're in the home stretch of the dumbest New Year's resolution you ever made and trying to finish 6 books in just over a week. Unlike Matt, though, I'm totally willing to sacrifice content for bragging rights and an opportunity to shit-talk. Hello, The Niigata Sake Book!

12.21.2011

41. Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist

Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist, Rachel Cohn and David Levithan
Alfred A. Knopf (Random House) e-book, 183 pages, 2006

And here's another YA book that I decided to read because I liked the movie. Except in this case, unlike Holes, I actually--don't hurt me--thought the movie was better. True, the book didn't involve Michael Cera, but Norah's character was completely different between the two versions. The Norah in the movie was cool, a little insecure, but just enough to be relatable, and down-to-earth; the book Norah was high-strung, foul-mouthed, and (to put it bluntly) extremely annoying.

I also kind of dislike books (A Great and Terrible Beauty, I'm looking at you) where the female characters are all "frenemies" and spend the whole time stealing each others' boyfriends and stabbing each other in the back but at the same time they're supposed to have a meaningful relationship. I mean I guess that is reality for some teenage girls (?) but it just makes no sense to me and I cannot follow it or remember who is supposed to be friends with who and why. Complex relationships are great but these characters just change their feelings about each other seemingly at random, and as much as I hate to say it I liked it better in the movie when Tris was just a "mean girl" persecuting Norah. At least it was consistent.

The best parts of Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist were Nick's chapters, written by David Levithan. I've never read any of his work before but he's supposed to be kind of a big deal in the YA world, and I really want to read his new book for adults, The Lover's Dictionary (which, sadly, is unavailable in Japan).

Next up: The Lake by Banana Yoshimoto

40. Mockingjay

Mockingjay, Suzanne Collins
Scholastic Press e-book, 288 pages, 2010

Maryann and I had a conversation the other day that clarified my thoughts on the Hunger Games trilogy as a whole, and what I thought was its major flaw: Katniss doesn't change or grow as a character at all throughout the books. She's portrayed as kind of an unlikable personality to begin with--surly, distrustful, far less crowd-pleasing than the kind and honest Peeta--and it works in the first book when she's fighting for survival and sacrificing herself to save her sister. But in the second and third books she remains completely self-centered as the struggle she's caught up in grows bigger and bigger around her, and it's frustrating.

I disagree with Maryann on the ending; I think Katniss ended up with the right guy (trying not to spoil things here although you probably shouldn't be reading this anyway if you haven't read the book and want to). I disliked what they did with Peeta through most of the book, and I think the final chapters had a kind of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows bloodbath thing going on where characters were killed seemingly at random and their deaths were barely noticed (spoilers, highlight to read: FINNICK!!!!!! Plot-wise there was NO reason he had to die, except that he was a newlywed and that's apparently the rule in these situations. Bonus cheap drama points if his wife is pregnant. How boring and predictable.) But honestly, all this is just nitpicking the most enjoyable series I've read in quite a while. Still highly recommended.

39. Holes

Holes, Louis Sachar
Yearling (Random House) e-book, 233 pages, 1998

Holes came highly recommended by Susi, and I'd seen the movie years ago and loved it, so when I saw that it was available as an e-book from the San Francisco Public Library, I jumped on it. (Yes, I also needed a short, easy read to keep up with the book challenge. And by "keep up with" I mean "desperately try to close the yawning gap between the number of books I should have read and the number I've actually read.") Anyway, I'm glad I did because the book was fantastic--tightly plotted, surprising, and full of more poetry and romance and wonder than I would have expected from the author of There's a Boy in the Girls' Bathroom. (Not, to be fair, that I've ever read it, or any of Sachar's other books, but I'll admit I didn't expect at 24 to enjoy a book by an author that was popular with the boys in my class in the fifth grade. Huh.)

Oh, and as this was my first library e-book checkout, I might as well note that it's extremely strange to me that the library actually links to the Amazon website for checkout, complete with "Customers who bought this item also bought..." links (for purchase, not library checkout). Huh?? Also, when the book is returned, you get an email from Amazon reminding you that if you check the book out again or purchase it for Kindle your notes and highlights will be preserved. I mean, in a sense that's useful information, but it still feels icky for an online commercial giant to be so all over a library book checkout. (That said, it is pretty fucking sweet that I can read San Francisco public library books while living in Japan.)

38. The Elements of Style

The Elements of Style, William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White
Allyn & Bacon, 95 pages, 2000 (originally published in 1959)

Okay, I have two shocking and embarrassing things to admit here. The first is that I've actually never sat down and read The Elements of Style cover to cover. (Yes, despite the number of times I told you to read it instead of directly critiquing your writing. People who worked with me on [X]Press, feel free to draw and quarter me now.) And the second is that now that I have read it in its entirety, I completely understand why many people think it's outdated.

The trick is in knowing which rules to follow and which to ignore--and if you're the kind of person most desperately in need of this book, you probably don't know the difference. Unfortunately, this makes it useless to tone-deaf writers. The Elements of Style is most useful to teachers and editors who are trying to verbalize principles that come intuitively to them. I've seen so many writers fail to follow even basic principles such as "Keep related words together" (not to mention pretty much all of the ones involving comma placement and usage), and White clearly and simply explains the problem and how to fix it where I could only sputter incoherently and/or drink as I edited. Many of the rules in the "Misused Words and Expressions" chapter have become obsolete by descriptivist standards, if they were indeed ever correct in the first place and not just personal quirks of William Strunk Jr. (as E.B. White's preface seems to indicate). But certain sections of the book are pure gold. It is itself an example of the principles it outlines; it's beautifully written, often funny (though always understated), vivid and fresh. It can improve writing at all levels; some principles ("Write with nouns and verbs") involve a bit of finesse, others ("Be clear") are deceptively simple, but all of them make me realize just how far I still have to go. Reading it makes me want to be a better writer and editor.

Oh, and guess what? This is my blog and I can make a post consisting almost entirely of quotations from The Elements of Style if I want to. Suck it.

"It is nouns and verbs, not their assistants, that give good writing its toughness and color."

Two examples for Principle of Composition #16, "Use definite, specific, concrete language": "He showed satisfaction as he took possession of his well-earned reward." vs. "He grinned as he pocketed the coin."


On parallel construction for related concepts: "The unskilled writer often violates this principle, mistakenly believing in the value of constantly varying the form of expression."


An example of the consequences of not keeping related words together: "New York's first commercial human-sperm bank opened Friday with semen samples from eighteen men frozen in a stainless steel tank ... In the lefthand version of the third example, the reader's heart goes out to those eighteen poor fellows frozen in a steel tank."


"Inexperienced writers not only overwork their adverbs but load their attributives with explanatory verbs: 'he consoled,' 'she congratulated.' They do this, apparently, in the belief that the word said is always in need of support, or because they have been told to do it by experts in the art of bad writing." (In English classes from elementary school on up through high school, we received a handout of a list of synonyms for "said" to use in our writing. I think Mrs. Hillesland might have even given us one.)


"When you become hopelessly mired in a sentence, it is best to start fresh; do not try to fight your way through against the terrible odds of syntax." 


"Young writers often suppose that style is a garnish for the meat of prose, a sauce by which a dull dish is made palatable. Style has no such separate entity; it is nondetachable, unfilterable."

12.19.2011

37. The Adventures of Tom Sawyer

The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, Mark Twain
Signet Classics, 215 pages, 1876

I decided to read this because after finishing Huck Finn I wanted to hang out with Mark Twain and his wonderful narrative voice for just a little longer, and it was already on my shelf. Mark Twain (like Haruki Murakami) is one of those authors who could write about anything and still have my interest. I kind of wish I had read it before Huck Finn, just for the extra insights into Huck's character, which were really all I got out of this. I wish I had more to say about it but being unable to finish this post is keeping me from posting about other books that I have LOTS to say about, so up this goes.

12.12.2011

36. Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain
Google e-book, 313 pages, 1885

Earlier this year, a publisher decided to print an edition of Adventures of Huckleberry Finn that substituted "slave" for a certain infamous racial slur that occurs 219 times in the novel. This is not all that interesting in and of itself, but around the same time, this jackass decided to attempt to turn around a lifetime of violent racism by "apologizing" for it on national television, and a comment on Metafilter decided to pull the two stories together and set a quote from said jackass ("And I found out there is no way I could be saved and get to heaven and still not like blacks") against the climactic scene in Huck Finn, in which Huck decides that he will go to hell rather than turn Jim in to his owner. That comparison alone was enough to make me reconsider the novel I'd read as an 11th grade AP English student and completely dismissed because it was written in dialect and was about a bunch of hicks and, like, slavery was over anyway. (Oh how embarrassing it is to recall this.)

Upon rereading, I still don't think Huckleberry Finn is a watershed moment in the history of American race relations. The climax is a truly life-changing and dramatic moment, but there are so many problems in the rest of the book (particularly the portrayal of Jim as a servile buffoon) that it loses some of its impact, and overall the messages are mixed. I do admire it for other reasons, though. Huck's voice is charming and expressive, and signified a break from proper British prose and the beginning of a genuine American literature. The book works best as a coming-of-age story, the story of Huck's search for freedom and developing sense of right and wrong (not only regarding Jim and slavery but also in scenes like the attempted swindle of the Wilks sisters, from which Jim is completely absent).

Among all the book endings I've read this year (or ever, really), the last paragraph of Huck Finn is one of my favorites:

"Tom's most well now, and got his bullet around his neck on a watch-guard for a watch, and is always seeing what time it is, and so there ain't nothing more to write about, and I am rotten glad of it, because if I'd a knowed what a trouble it was to make a book I wouldn't a tackled it, and ain't a-going to no more.  But I reckon I got to light out for the Territory ahead of the rest, because Aunt Sally she's going to adopt me and sivilize me, and I can't stand it.  I been there before."

(Note: I read this Google ebook, which seems to be the only free copy in Google Books that is plain text instead of a scanned PDF. I think they used some kind of text-recognition software to convert it--most of it is okay, but there are times when it tries to turn dialect into "real" words [for example, "clumb," the past tense of "climb" in Huck's dialect, becomes "dumb"], and it really, REALLY doesn't like Jim's speech and periodically turns it into sprays of random letters and punctuation marks. I had to consult the print version a couple times to figure out what was going on. Probably worth paying the 5 bucks for a paper copy, if you don't live in Japan.)

34. The Great Night

The Great Night, Chris Adrian
Farrar, Straus and Giroux ebook, 310 pages, 2011

Holy Shakespeare I am behind on book posts. It's actually been more than a month since I read this now. The Great Night is Adrian's retelling (more of an homage, really) of A Midsummer Night's Dream, set in Buena Vista Park in modern-day San Francisco. Oberon and Titania are recast as supernatural parents who have recently lost their young son to leukemia; the acting troupe becomes a group of homeless people determined to speak out via musical theater about (what they believe is) the mayor's plan to turn the city's homeless into food, and the original play's four lovers are now three heartbroken San Franciscans who become lost in the park on their way to a party. It reminded me a lot of early Francesca Lia Block, after Weetzie Bat but before all the dark confessional stuff, seamlessly and whimsically weaving faeries and magical creatures into a modern-day urban scene--not literary, necessarily, but entertaining and bawdy and a whole lot of fun. On the other hand, my opinion of the book is mixed--I agree with one review (which I can't find now) that said the portrayal of Titania and Oberon as godlike creatures who ultimately cannot prevent or deal with their son's death was by far the best-written and most moving part of the book. The stories of the three human lovers never quite reach a satisfying conclusion, only a threesome.

35. Island Beneath the Sea

Island Beneath the Sea, Isabel Allende
HarperCollins ebook, 419 pages, 2010, translated by Margaret Sayers Peden

Reading Isabel Allende these days is like, I don't know, going to your favorite restaurant and ordering the steak with fries instead of trying out the hip new Ethiopian place*. It's boring (if satisfying); you already know exactly what you're going to get, which in this case is an enormous cast of characters who evolve slowly and aimlessly over a long period of time, sumptuous descriptions of gowns and French meals and ballrooms, beautiful courtesans, honorable soldiers, and a little bit of political unrest. In that sense it was fine, but the problem was that I actually actively disliked all the characters, except the relatively minor Sancho, and maybe (if pressed) Maurice. It was a little disappointing overall, but I'll probably still read whatever she comes out with next.

*If your immediate, instinctive response to this is "HURF DURF I DIDN'T KNOW THEY EVEN HAD FOOD IN ETHIOPIA," please re-evaluate your life